Spoken, Not Seen: 6-Day Creation

My atheist friends often present Genesis 1 as the ultimate proof text that God doesn’t exist. It goes like this:

1) The Bible says God created the universe in 6 days, 6,000 years ago.
2) We clearly observe with our eyes that the universe appears much older than this.
3) Therefore the Bible must be wrong, and it is not a Word from God.

They are absolutely correct about (1) and (2)—but wrong about (3). Because this assumes that what we see, experience, and reason are the only things that determine what is real.

1) The Bible says God created the universe in 6 days, 6,000 years ago

The Bible does say God created the universe in 6 days, 6,000 years ago. And while there’s a few points of the Hebrew in Genesis 1-2 that require careful reading, you don’t need to know any Hebrew to understand the plain sense meaning of Exodus 20:11:

For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day. (Exodus 20:11)

Even just from a reading of the English of that verse, it’s clear: the Bible unambiguously teaches that God made the universe in 6 days.

2) We clearly observe with our eyes that the universe appears much older than this

The Bible tells us things about creation that did not fit what even the first readers of Genesis could see with their eyes.

Adam was created in Genesis 1:27 and 2:7 as a mature adult human being. That very same day he talked with God (Genesis 2:15-17), named all the animals (2:18-21), and got married (Genesis 2:22-25). No people group—no matter how ancient—would have seen or experienced a man appearing instantly mature. It does not fit the ordinary human experience of any culture.

But not just that: in the Garden of Eden a snake talks (Genesis 3:1). There’s simply no culture on earth where that’s ever been a normal observed reality.

Even for the very first readers of Genesis, what is being described does not fit their observations, experiences, and natural reason.

3) But! This does not mean the Bible must be wrong—because it is the Word of God

Here is how God’s Word works:

God’s Word tells us what something is.
Our senses tell us what it looks like.
Faith refuses to let ‘looks like’ redefine ‘is’.

This is not just about creation—it is how the whole Christian faith works. The Bible tells us this in several places:

Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. For by it the people of old received their commendation. By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible. (Hebrews 11:1-3)

The book of Hebrews describes faith as assurance of what God’s Word says—even though this is not seen.

we walk by faith, not by sight. (2 Corinthians 5:7)

Here the apostle Paul explains that Christians are those who live by what they are assured is true from God’s Word, rather than what they see.

But, while we receive God’s Word as he speaks—even when it goes beyond or against what we can see—we are still free to describe and work within the world as it appears to us in matters of ordinary life and vocation. God made the world we see (Genesis 1)—and he made it with wisdom:

The LORD by wisdom founded the earth; by understanding he established the heavens; (Proverbs 3:19)

So, the Bible tells us the world is stable, ordered, and intelligible. We are meant to live and work within it as it appears to us. The wisdom literature (Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes) even encourages us to look at the creation and draw conclusions for our lives from it.

So, because of this freedom, faith does not abolish sight (2 Corinthians 5:7). But where faith and sight seem to conflict, we do not resolve the tension by reinterpreting the Word, but by trusting it.

This occurs in every part of the Christian Gospel, but we see it most clearly in the Lord’s Supper:

Christ says, “This is my body.”—His Word makes this reality.
Our senses still perceive bread—and we handle it and chew it as bread.
We confess that it is both body and bread without explaining it away or reducing one to the other.

In the same way, we confess that God made the world in 6 Days:

God says what happened. We receive it as true.
We also observe, study the world, and build technology as it appears.
We don’t force a synthesis.

We don’t override the Word.

This also shows something deeper: faith can never be created—or even prepared for—by observation, experience, or reasoned logical argument. My atheist friends therefore often ask me “Why would I have faith?”

And the answer is: because God gives us faith as a gift. God’s mercy and forgiveness are objective realities. They exist outside of our experience. Jesus:

…entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. (Hebrews 9:12)

This happened outside our sight and beyond what we could discover by experience and reason—but it determines what is true for us now. This eternal redemption is what God gives to us through his Word. Faith is the assurance that we have it. That’s why faith itself is a supernatural gift.

And that’s why God gave you the church—as the place where you can receive this supernatural forgiveness and assurance from outside your experience. Beyond anything you can see. Come along in person any Sunday, or join online on Wednesday from anywhere:

4 responses to “Spoken, Not Seen: 6-Day Creation”

  1. David Milne avatar
    David Milne

    Pete, it never fails to astonish me that the religiously inculcated brains of believers can go through such tedious convolutions in order to try and convince themselves they are right – that they have all the answers!
    eg ‘That’s why faith is a supernatural gift.’ Did God send you a personal email confirming this with you – or is that you pretending that faith, being supernatural, is somehow evidence for the existence of the supernatural god which you hope is there?
    (I love the way ‘Adam’ is portrayed as a muscular white guy wearing underpants….!)
    Let’s remind ourselves that whilst a member of a different branch of Christianity you accepted evolution by means of natural selection, but on becomimg a Lutheran you now reject evolution.
    What that tells me is that your life is run on ideological grounds, and you are prepared to reject science when it doesn’t fit in with that ideology.
    Nothing new here……..

    1. pete avatar

      Hi David!

      Thanks for commenting.

      Just for the record: I have never held the epistemic view that the Bible’s account of creation is not true because science says something different. You are right that before becoming Lutheran I held different views to the Lutheran views I now hold. One of those views was the nature of the Hebrew wayyiqtol in Genesis 2. I’d be happy to talk that through some time. The reason I now hold Lutheran views is because through hearing the Bible taught, my beliefs came fully into line with it, and various confusions cleared up. Because there are lots of different collections of opinions (as there are in any field) we need to label them in order to talk coherently. And simply receiving everything the Bible says is “confessional Lutheran.”

      You’re right there’s nothing new in this post from our previous conversations: I’ve been saying since I first met you that sight, observation, reason and evidence do not create faith. That’s not what faith is.

      You’re also right that I live my life on ideological grounds. That’s one implication of “walking by faith, not by sight.”

      However, that’s not an outright rejection of science. And you may note in the post that we all live our lives engaging with the creation as we see it. So, Christians working in astrophysics, for example, need to operate within the reasonable models created from observing the universe. That’s not a “rejection” of science. It’s just an acknowledgement that science is not ultimate truth.

      1. David Milne avatar
        David Milne

        Pete, no-one has an ‘ultimate truth’, neither Religion nor Science. But Science is the best way we have of understanding the universe and how we came to wake up in it. For my money, ‘Does God exist’ is as much a question for science as for any religion. Is there any scientific evidence for god’s existence? None. Nothing. Thus believers are left solely with faith as their position. No evidence. When believers say ‘I have faith God exists’ I may (do!) disagree with them but at that point they are at least being honest with themselves and others. But do they stop there? NO! ‘Of course’ they say ‘God DOES exist’ and it’s at that point they become dishonest and disengenuous.

        1. pete avatar

          Hi David!

          God explicitly says you cannot reason about him from your scientific thinking:

          “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.” (Isaiah 55:8-9)

          So, you can carry on waving your angry stick at a straw man… or you can pause—recognise that you keep disagreeing with something that is not being said to you—and have a more meaningful conversation, if you would like. 😀 😀

          You “conclude” in your comment “believers are left solely with faith as their position” — that is the explicit argument of the post we’re commenting on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *